This guy is a liar and a thief, stay away

OFFICIAL MEDIA ALERT Press Release August 1st 2008 Contact Information: 928-274-7648 -TRIAL DATES ANNOUNCED- SEDONA CHOPPERS v. REMAX OF SEDONA, HARRY CHRISTIE Case Number: S-0300-CV-20070791 AUG 13th, 14th and 15th at 9:00 a.m. Former owners of Sedona Choppers seek $1.2 million in lawsuit against Remax Sedona and Dual Broker for Non-Disclosure WHAT: TRIAL DATES: SEDONA CHOPPERS v. REMAX of SEDONA and Dual-Broker Harry Christie Former owners of Sedona Choppers file lawsuit against Remax of Sedona For Non-Disclosure of Uptown Enhancement Project WHEN: Wednesday August 13th, Thursday Aug 14th and Friday Aug 15th Times: To Be Determined WHERE: Coconino County Superior Courthouse, Flagstaff 200 N. San Francisco St. (Courthouse) Flagstaff AZ. 86001 (928) 779-6535 Case: http://www.supreme.state.az.us/publicaccess/notification/casedetail.asp?cs_id=kkiaaeoe&crt_name=Coconino%20County%20Superior Schedule: http://www.coconino.

http://www.isedona.net/TryAutoLogon.do As for Remax and the broker, the heart of the lawsuit focuses on the conflict of interest that can potentially arise from a dual broker relationship. A dual broker relationship occurs when one broker individually, or two salespeople within the same brokerage firm, represent both the buyer and the seller in a real estate transaction. Dual representation is lawful in Arizona with prior written consent, and so long as dual brokers exercise reasonable skill and care in the performance of their duties. However, Mr. W****erman contends that the dual broker relationship created a conflict of interest that erred on the side of the seller since that's who paid the broker.

Marc Seigleman is not only COMPLETELY unprofessional, he also uses ridiculous excuses to not provide the work he has been engaged to do (apprasial ****ignments). When asked about status on a report, he broke out into a rant of obscenities and threatened to turn our company in (to whom, I have no idea, perhaps his imaginary friends?) for calling on status of a past due order (nine days late, with no explanation). Our company will not only never send work to this joke of an appraiser again, but are also considering advising all of our contacts not to use him.